Retailers' knowledge of tobacco harm reduction following the introduction of a new brand of smokeless tobacco
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Tobacco retailers are potential public health partners for tobacco harm reduction (THR). THR is the substitution of highly reduced-risk nicotine products, such as smokeless tobacco (ST) or pharmaceutical nicotine, for cigarettes. The introduction of a Swedish-style ST product, du Maurier snus (dMS) (Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited), which was marketed as a THR product, provided a unique opportunity to assess retailers' knowledge. This study examined retailers' knowledge of THR and compliance with recommendations regarding tobacco sales to young adults. METHODS Male researchers, who may have looked younger than 18 years old, visited 60 stores in Edmonton that sold dMS. The researchers asked the retailers questions about dMS and its health risks relative to those from other tobacco products. They also attempted to purchase dMS to ascertain whether retailers would ask for identification to verify that they were at least 18 years old. RESULTS Overall, the retailers were only moderately knowledgeable about THR and the differences between dMS and other tobacco products. About half of the retailers correctly indicated that snus is safer than cigarettes; half of whom knew it is safer because it is smoke-free. Fifty percent incorrectly believed that snus causes oral cancer. Less than fifty percent indicated that dMS differs from chewing tobacco because it is in pouches and is used without spitting or chewing (making it more promising for THR). Most (90%) of the retailers asked the researchers for identification when selling dMS. CONCLUSION Tobacco retailers are potentially important sources of information about THR, particularly since there are restrictions on the promotion of all tobacco products (regardless of the actual health risks) in Canada. This study found that many retailers in Edmonton do not know the relative health risks of different tobacco products and are therefore unable to pass on accurate information to smokers.
منابع مشابه
شیوع مصرف تنباکوی غیرتدخینی در دانشجویان پسر دانشگاههای شهر زاهدان و آگاهی از مضرات آن در سال 1391
Introduction: Smokeless tobacco is a cause +of oral cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of smokeless tobacco use among male students in Zahedan Universities and knowledge of its side effects in 2012. Materials & Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 431 male students of Zahedan universities were selected by multi stage random cluster sampling. A questionnaire was us...
متن کاملGenotoxic and Carcinogenic Effect of Gutkha: A Fast-growing Smokeless Tobacco
Oral cancer is a highly lethal disease and one of the most debilitating and disfiguring of all malignancies in the world. According to Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) 2010 report, 60% of tobacco users in India use only smokeless tobacco. Among 206 million smokeless tobacco users, 65.1 million are consuming gutkha. In recent years, gutkha is recognized as a life threatening disorder with the ...
متن کاملStudy on tobacco consumption patterns and its determinants in an urban slum in New Mumbai
Background and aims: India has a high burden of tobacco usage and its related morbidity and mortality. Almost 30% of the above 15 years of age of the Indian population use some forms of tobacco. Men usually use smoked tobacco, while women more likely use smokeless (chewed) tobacco. Tobacco usage has been identified as a risk factor for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) among slum dwellers in urb...
متن کاملQuantifying the effects of promoting smokeless tobacco as a harm reduction strategy in the USA.
BACKGROUND Snus (a form of smokeless tobacco) is less dangerous than cigarettes. Some health professionals argue that snus should be promoted as a component of a harm reduction strategy, while others oppose this approach. Major US tobacco companies (RJ Reynolds and Philip Morris) are marketing snus products as cigarette brand line extensions. The population effects of smokeless tobacco promotio...
متن کاملEuropean Union policy on smokeless tobacco: a statement in favour of evidence based regulation for public health.
RATIONALE This statement is an updated version of one released by the same authors in February 2003. The statement was produced to follow up the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) Tobacco Advisory Group report "Protecting smokers, saving lives: the case for a tobacco and nicotine regulatory authority", which argued for an evidence based regulatory approach to smokeless tobacco and harm reduction...
متن کامل